Writing professional RFP documents:

Learn secrets used by countless organizations to win
contracts through an RFP-based selection process.

Get your FREE RFP Letters Toolkit, 2011 EditionGet your FREE RFP Letters Toolkit, 2011 Edition

FREE Request for Proposal (RFP) Letters, including FREE samples of Letter of Intent, Disqualification Letter, Rejection Letter, Protest Letter, and Cover Letter
Wednesday May 16, 2012
RFP Evaluation CentersHome | How to write an RFP LetterHow to write an RFP Letter | FREE RFP Letters Templates and SamplesFREE RFP Letters Templates and Samples
Writing professional RFP documents, Get your RFP Letters Toolkit 2011 Edition
              Free of charge            Immediate delivery to your email            Call 1-800-496-1303 ext. 273
Get a FREE RFP Template Sample

FREE RFP Documents including:
Successfull RFPs in Construction NEW!
RFP Template
Acquisition Plan Template NEW!
RFP Cover Letter
Proposal Cover Letter
Executive Summary Template NEW!
FREE Company Profile Template
Disqualification Letter
Rejection Letter
Non-Binding Letter of Intent
Decision Matrix
No-Bid Letter
Protest Letter
Sole Source Protest Letter
Sole Source Justification & Approval (J&A)
Letter to Decline a Proposal
Contract Award Letter
 
FREE Requests for Proposals
(RFP) Template Samples:

Software RFP Template
Process ERP RFP Template
Discrete ERP RFP Template
CRM RFP Template
Accounting RFP Template

The Best
Proposal-related Book

Latest Procurement News & Bids Opportunities from Federal Agencies

FAQ about RFP and Proposals:
MADM-Based ERP Software Selection
Compare ERP NEW!
Sealed Bids NEW!
What is Competitive Procurement?
Uniform Contract Format (UCF)
What is Sole Source?
Abstract vs. Executive Summary: Discover The Main Differences NEW!
The Bid/No-Bid Analysis NEW!
Best-known Readability Scores
Bormuth Readability Score
List of Work Words NEW!
47 FREE Affidavit Form Samples NEW!
Bidder Responsibility Determination
Bid Responsiveness Determination
Food Court RFP Examples NEW!
Meta Tag Generator NEW!

More FAQ...Expand RFP FAQ

The Best
RFP-related Book

Bormuth Readability Score

FREE RFP Letters ToolkitAlso known as: Bormuth, Bormuth reading level, Bormuth grade, Bormuth grade level, Bormuth readability, Bormuth index, Bormuth grade level score, Bormuth reading ease, Bormuth scale, Bormuth reading, Bormuth readability statistics, Bormuth score, Bormuth readability test, Bormuth reading assessment, Bormuth readability assessment, Bormuth readability score, reading power degrees, Degrees of Reading Power, Degrees of Reading Power (DRP), or DRP.

Like other best-known readability scores, the Bormuth Grade Level readability score is also based on a count of characters rather than syllables per word and words per sentence to determine a score corresponding to the estimated grade level or grade level score. The formula was designed to evaluate more academic documents, i.e. school textbooks.

Bormuth Grade Level Formula

Also known as: Bormuth formula, Bormuth equation, Bormuth Grade Level formula, or DRP readability formula.

The formula for the Bormuth readability score formula is:

BGL = 0.886593
-  (AWL x 0.03640)
+ (AFW x 0.161911)
-  (ASL x 0.21401)
-  (ASL x 0.000577)
-  (ASL x 0.000005)

where:

BGL : Bormuth grade level score or Bormuth readability score
AWL : average word length or number of characters per word (number of characters divided by the number of words)
AFW : average familiar words per word (the number of words in the original Dale-Chall list of 3,000 simple words divided by the number of words)
ASL : average sentence length in words or average number of words in sentence (number of words divided by the number of sentences)

The Bormuth readability score formula is also known as Degrees of Reading Power (DRP).

Common misspellings: bromuth score, bormuth raedability score, bomruth score, bormuth socre, bormtuh score, bormuth garde level score, borumth score, bormuth lveel, bormuht score, bormuth fromula, bormuth grdae level score, bormuth graed level score.

Best-known Readability Statistics, Scores, and Formulas

The Bormuth readability score is part of the best-known readability scores, amongst other indicators measuring how easily an adult can read and understand a text. Readability statistics are good predictors of the level of difficulty of documents, particularly technical ones. They present different readability scoress that are computed using readability formulas. Other than Bormuth score, readability statistics most commonly used are:

How to display Bormuth Readability Score?

Microsoft Word (MS Word), as a powerful word processor, provide you with a built-in tool to display the readability score list, amongst other readability statistics, but, unfortunately, not Bormuth readability score:

  1. On the Tools menu, click Options, and then click the Spelling & Grammar tab.
  2. Select the Check grammar with spelling check box.
  3. Select the Show readability statistics check box, and then click OK.
  4. Click Spelling and Grammar on the Standard toolbar.
    It is only when Word finishes checking spelling and grammar that it will display information about the reading level of the document. To skip the correction process, press the "Ignore All" button located in the upper right part of the suggestion box, then will appear the Readability Statistics box.

    Bormuth score is not listed but can be computed by applying the aforementioned formula with the average number of words, characters, and sentences displayed in the readability statistics list. Please notice that, in order to compute the Bormuth readability index according to the formula, you need the number of familiar words and not the mere number of words. Therefore, assuming there is low number of familiar words in the text (let's say 10% for instance, which is very conservative), you can compute a score that would be considered as the maximum Bormuth readability score.

Be aware that MS Word displays readability scores for text in the last language that was checked, likely in the last processed paragraph.

FREE RFP Letters Toolkit, 2009 EditionWANT TEMPLATES AND SAMPLES
FOR PROFESSIONAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS LETTERS?

Learn tips on how to write a professional, very impressive, and bullet-proof Request for Proposals letters in our FREE Request for Proposals Toolkit, 2009 Edition.

You will find in it lots of templates and samples of professional letters.

It's FREE!
 

"No doubt that these letters save time"
- Pascal PERRY

Read the Report that software vendors don't want you to know about
Email address: 

Close the window

Federal Contract Oversight

by Project on Government Oversight (POGO)
 FREE RFP Letters Toolkit, 2009 Edition

Podcast: How Bad Performance Can Be Good for Business in Government ContractingExpand

POGO's Scott Amey dishes out a post-mortem on a recent Commission on Wartime Contracting hearing--at which he testified--on contractor accountability..

POGO Provides Post-hearing Supplemental Materials to the Commission on Wartime ContractingExpand

Pursuant to the Commission on Wartime Contracting's (Commission) request that the record for the hearing held on February 28, 2011, "Ensuring contractor accountability: Past performance and suspensions and debarments," be supplemented within thirty days, the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) provides the following information. Specifically, POGO believes the Commission should recommend that the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) be expanded in scope and that the Department of Defense's (DoD) revolving door database of senior level acquisition officials be made publicly available.[2].

Solution: How the Government Can Stop Doing Business With Risky ContractorsExpand

It is very hard for the federal government to have a successful criminal or civil prosecution of their contractors and it is the hardest to do with the Department of Defense (DoD). In January, the DoD created a stir when it released its Report to Congress on Contracting Fraud, which examined the extent to which the Pentagon awarded contracts to companies that defrauded the government. The report found that, from Fiscal Year 2007 to Fiscal Year (FY) 2009, the DoD awarded almost $270 billion in contracts to 91 contractors found liable in civil fraud cases, and $682 million to 30 contractors convicted of criminal fraud. .

U.S.Government Rarely Suspends or Debars Those Responsible for Billions in Tax Dollars Lost to Fraud, Waste, Abuse in War ZonesExpand

Tens of billions of dollars are being lost to waste and fraud in Iraq and Afghanistan because of a toothless U.S. contracting system so reliant on a handful of major contractors that it rarely suspends or desbars them, even when those companies have committed serious offenses, according to the Project On Government Oversight's (POGO) testimony today before a independent, federal commission..

Commercial Item Exceptions Must be Eliminated From New Suspension and Debarment RuleExpand

The Project On Government Oversight (POGO) provides the following public comment to FAR Case 2009-036, "Federal Acquisition Regulation; Uniform Suspension and Debarment Requirement" (75 Fed. Reg. 77739, December 13, 2010). The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (the Councils) issued an interim rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement section 815 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (P.L. 111-84), which extends the restriction on contracting to subcontractors at any tier that have been suspended or debarred, with certain exceptions for commercial item and commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) item acquisition contracts..

Should Debarred Contractors Be Allowed to Build Military Aircraft?Expand

Today, POGO submitted a public comment about a new rule limiting the ability of suspended or debarred contractors to do business with the federal government. The rule prohibits prime contractors from subcontracting with any entity that has been suspended, debarred, or proposed for debarment..

Pentagon Cuts Back Contract Audits, Opens Door for Contractor OverpaymentsExpand

Under the guise of eliminating overlap, the Pentagon last month sharply reduced oversight of defense contracts, according to memos obtained by the Project On Government Oversight (POGO). The changes, which give some of the duties of the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) to the less aggressive Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), were outlined in a January memo signed by Shay Assad, the director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy. DCAA staff were informed of the changes in a Jan. 31 memo from DCAA Director Patrick Fitzgerald..

Testimony of POGO's Nick Schwellenbach on "Improving Federal Contract Auditing"Expand

We believe that there should be an independent Federal Contract Audit Agency (FCAA), as long as it is done right. This isn't a new idea: it is an idea that has been batted around since at least the 1980s, when DCAA whistleblower George Spanton exposed serious problems at DCAA. .

Federal Government Needs Strong, Independent Auditor to Oversee Billions in Contract Spending, POGO Tells Senate PanelExpand

The responsibility of auditing the hundreds of billions of dollars spent each year on defense and civilian contracts should fall to a single, independent agency that is outside of the Pentagon's chain of command, the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) told a U.S. Senate panel today..

Last Modified: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:05:58 PM

Add our news feed to your favorites:

Add the RFP RSS feed to MyYahoo Add the RFP RSS feed to MyMSN Add the RFP RSS feed to BlogLines Add the RFP RSS feed to NewsGator



Recent Searches:

A: 14 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

B: 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

C: 14 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

D: 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

E: 14 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

F: 17 | 16 | 15 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

G: 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

H: 15 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

I: 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

J: 2 | 1
 

K: 1
 

L: 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

M: 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

N: 2 | 1
 

O: 3 | 2 | 1
 

P: 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

Q: 1
 

R: 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

S: 20 | 19 | 18 | 17 | 16 | 15 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

T: 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

U: 1
 

V: 2 | 1
 

W: 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1
 

X: 1
 

Y: 1
 

Z: 1
 

OTHERS: 3 | 2 | 1
 
Copyright © May 2012 by RFP Evaluation Centers. All rights reserved (Wednesday May 16, 2012)

RFP Evaluation Centers
740 Saint-Maurice Street, 4th floor
Montréal (Québec) H3C 1L5, Canada
1-800-496-1303 ext. 273 (toll free)
1-514-954-3665 ext. 273 (office)
1-514-954-9739 (fax)
Disclaimer:
We maintain this web site as a service we gracefully offer you, decision makers working at organizations whether requesting or providing external services and products, and who are interested in finding online free templates and samples of documents related to solicitation and selection processes. You are hereby cautioned not to consider the content provided on this web site and all its ancillary documents as a legal or contracting policy advice whatsoever. Indeed, this information should not be relied upon as a substitution for consulting a lawyer. We provide you, only as a convenience, with external references (books, links, etc.) that are not under our control. We are not responsible for their content and, therefore, assume no liability.

We are eager to help you out in your information quest, call us at our toll-free number 1-800-496-1303 ext. 273.